Community Development Venture Capital †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Community Development Venture Capital. Answer: Introduction The Torres Strait Islanders are the native people of the Queensland region of Australia. However, there is a difference between the Aboriginals residing in the rest of Australia and the Torres Strait Islanders. There are two categories of Torres Strait Islanders staying closer to the coast and mainland of Bamage and Seisia. These native people have a distinct culture, which varies on the types of islands they are living in. This essay will look into the development of ATSI community by combining the specific theories to focus on the desired changes in the society. Rothmans model will be used to describe the approach of community work suitable for the ATSI (Arsenberg, 2017). The area of Torres Strait Island has 6800 residents and another 42000 live in the north of Queensland, especially in Cairns and Townsville. The aboriginals are indigenous of Australia as similar to the Torres Strait Islanders; however, the later belong to Melanesian origin. The aboriginals and the Torres Strait Islanders are the primitive population of the Australian land and region. Their knowledge of land and water is original which has come down their ancestral lineage. Such indigenous knowledge was effective in forming a spiritual, social and economic connection with the country. The connection with the land and region of Australia has travelled from the past and developed the present for shaping a better future (Lee, Kim Phillips, 2015). As the aboriginals are struggling for their land rights, therefore this area can be chosen as an area of change. To throw light on the intervention for change in community Rothman model can be used for taking a wider view. This model was effective in observing this practice as an enriching field including program planning, evaluation, administration, policy analysis and development and resource development and allocation. The strategic and intentional considerations were stressed upon for the change in ATSI community (Shragge, 2003). It was helpful with regard to social planning, policy initiatives based on neighborhood citizen and the development approaches, and advocacy- oriented community accomplishment. Further, it can be mentioned that the formulation of community interference comprises of different kinds of practices. The distinctive forms include practice of social policy planning, developing capacity and advocacy. The ATSI community has created their own knowledge and understanding of the ecological system, which reflects the present symbiotic relationship with their traditional land and water. The knowledge of this community regarding their land and water has helped in protecting the climate, people, land, culture and biodiversity (Hardina, 2012). In this way, they have been able to establish a mutual culture with the environment from a long time. Land is regarded as the base of entire aboriginal relationship, their economy, cultural practices and identity. Even though the land has suffered a lot due to illegal capture, the community did not fail to retain their connection with the same through narration, political activities and other ceremonies. The community has continued their struggle for land rights to attain recognition and respect. According to Kenny, McGrath Phillips (2017), community development is such a field of study, which consists of social and political movements. It aims to develop the community and make the world a better place to live in. This book has focused on the activities taken up by the communities to fulfill their needs by gathering required resources. In the Australian context, community development by means of different programs targets to assure that the natives fit into the western culture to lead an improved life. Therefore, the democratic theory can be suitable in this respect as the ATSI community need their freedom and be a part of the whole of Australia by overcoming the challenges. The community development agents are known as the external professionals who hold different views on this practice. While some consider it as a job or profession, others think it to be suitable for someone who is not a part of the community. The Rothman model of community organization is based on the concept that to bring about change in the community, the local people should be involved in the process of planning, implementation and analysis. It involves the three models of locality development, social planning and social action. The locality development model refers to the belief that to bring about change in the community more people should be involved in the process. For instance, the fight of the aboriginals of Australia for land and water should encourage the rest of the natives too. It will make their struggle worthwhile with the use of democratic procedures and voluntary cooperation (Kovner Lerner, 2015). The social planning model is a technical process of problem- solving in association with significant problems of the society. However, in comparison to the previous model, the extent of community participation might vary in this model. The main aim of this model is not to enhance social change as part of community practice. For instance, the struggle of the ATSI community for land and water need to be considered as an important problem that requires technical process to be resolved. The social action model assumes that a disadvantaged portion of the society needs to be looked after for making demands on the fortunate community. The disadvantaged community consists of the aboriginals and tore strait islanders who deserve social justice and their value in decision- making process. As stated by Gilchrist (2009), the agents of community development take help of networking system to achieve their objective of developing communities and helping the members of the community to lead a better life. Conclusion It can be concluded from this essay that development of aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community requires immediate attention. Little bit of difference that exists between these native citizens of Australia need to be mitigated by the agents of community development. The Rothman model of community organization was used to focus on locality development, social planning and social action. The specific models have helped in discussing about the desired changes in the community that would help in their progress. References Arensberg, C. M. (2017).Introducing social change: A manual for community development. Routledge. Gilchrist, A. (2009).The well-connected community: a networking approach to community development. Policy Press. Hardina, D. (2012).Interpersonal social work skills for community practice. Springer Publishing Company. Kenny, S., McGrath, B., Phillips, R. (Eds.). (2017).The Routledge Handbook of Community Development: Perspectives from Around the Globe. Routledge. Kovner, A., Lerner, J. (2015). Doing well by doing good? Community development venture capital.Journal of Economics Management Strategy,24(3), 643-663. Lee, S. J., Kim, Y., Phillips, R. (2015). Exploring the intersection of community well-being and community development. InCommunity well-being and community development(pp. 1-7). Springer, Cham. Rothman, J. (1995).Strategies of community intervention: Macro practice. FE Peacock Publishers, Inc. Shragge, E. (2003) Social action and it's legacy for social change: Activism and Social Change.Broadview Press; Ontario.